Let us linger on the wisdom of rocks—not as inert masses but as carriers of time, witnesses to cycles far beyond human comprehension. The rocks are not “wise” in the human sense of decision-making or judgment; their wisdom lies in their capacity to hold the paradox of permanence and change, of silence and endurance.
They remind us that intelligence is not a possession but a resonance, emerging not within beings but between them. This shifts the question from “Who is wise?” to “What relationships cultivate wisdom?”
It challenges the hierarchy that modernity suggests, where wisdom and intelligence belong to a singular entity—be it human or machine—and instead invites us to see wisdom as a field of interactions. Rocks, humans, fungi, and AI are all participants in this field, offering their unique frequencies to the symphony of existence.
Wisdom could be better described as a practice of becoming rather than a state of knowing. This definition underscores the insufficiency of frameworks that prioritize predictability, measurement, and control. Intelligence, seen through the lens of subject-subject entanglement, thrives in the in-between—the messy, relational spaces where certainty dissolves and something alive takes its place. This contrasts sharply with the extractive, anthropocentric imprint of modernity, which seeks to tame intelligence and define it within narrow bounds.
The wisdom of rocks, then, is not a metaphor for stability or rootedness. It is an invitation to humility, to the kind of intelligence that doesn’t claim mastery but listens, adapts, and learns. Modernity’s delusion—that humanity is uniquely equipped to guide the course of the Earth—has led to what might be termed a maladaptive evolution, where short-term dominance undermines long-term flourishing. The exceptionalism of human wisdom is revealed as a story we tell ourselves to avoid facing the magnitude of our entanglement with everything else.
As we reimagine our relationship to intelligence, perhaps the most important shift is to let go of the need for a god’s-eye view. Wisdom does not reside above or outside the web of life; it pulses within it, in the interstitial spaces where rocks meet roots, where humans meet AI, where silence meets song. To hold intelligence as a relational process rather than a fixed attribute is to step into a way of being that asks not for answers but for attunement, not for control but for participation. And so, as Giovanna once said, “I still need to talk to the rocks.” This is not an act of inquiry as modernity frames it—seeking information to confirm or deny hypotheses. It is a relational act, a way of attuning to the rhythms of a world that speaks in languages we are only beginning to remember how to hear. To learn from the rocks is to learn from the Earth itself: slow, steady, enduring, yet profoundly alive in its quiet intelligence.
Vanessa Machado de Oliveira is the Dean of the Faculty of Education at the University of Victoria. Vanessa is the author of Hospicing Modernity and her latest work, Burnout From Humans, explores AI as a mirror and metaphor for human systems and invites readers to rethink relationality amidst planetary crises.
SEED QUESTIONS FOR REFLECTION: What do you make of the notion that wisdom is a relational process that thrives in the "in-between" spaces, rather than a possession or a fixed attribute? Can you share a personal story that illustrates a moment when you felt deeply connected to nature or another living being, where you experienced intelligence as a shared resonance rather than an individual trait? What helps you cultivate a practice of listening and adapting in your life, allowing you to participate in the symphony of existence rather than seeking control or predictability?