The Fallacy of Togetherness

Image of the Week
Image of the Week

Make friends with those who are on the path at least as much as you are. If they do not take you forward, at least they do not become a reason to move you backward on your quest. If this is not possible, just walk alone. The companionship of fools is not good. Remember one thing, you have come alone in this world and will leave this world alone. The togetherness ideal is just a way to make you feel better. That is why it is important to learn the art of solitude. In the company of a person who has gone deeper into themselves, you will feel their company as well as solitude.

Crowds are formed by people who are focused on the external. It’s a miracle to see that there are no crowds to be seen when you are with people who are focused in and within themselves. If ten internally focused individuals are sitting in a room, it is not that there are ten internally focused individuals sitting. It is each individual sitting by themselves, thereby not forming a crowd.

Internally focused people don’t make bridges to the outside. If there are ten externally focused people sitting, there not a crowd of ten people – it is a crowd of ten thousand. This is because each individual is connecting with the other ten and so on. Thousands of relationships are been forged. Even if internally focused people are together, they leave each other alone. The best company is offered from people who allow you to be alone even while you are with them. The people worth developing company with are people who let your solitude retain its purity. Reflection can only happen in solitude.

The naturalness and nakedness of your solitude maintains its pristine state. Your aloneness, your silence remains untouched and pure. They respect your boundaries and do not become a reason for disturbing your solitude. They provide company, one which does not invade your space. When you call them, they come near to you. Only as near as you call them and no more.

They leave you alone when you want to go inside of yourself.

--Osho

Moved by this reading? Join a live Awakin Circle to discuss in community.
Join this week
More ways to connect

Add Your Reflection

31 Past Reflections
XH
Xuan Hoa
May 29, 2026
In which of Osho's books is the above excerpt taken?
TC
Jul 16, 2019
OSHO...The ENLIGHTENED MASTER... The SAGE Who Walked ALONE...
TC
Jul 16, 2019
OSHO---The SAGE Who Walks ALONE...
AM
Alex Moore
Dec 2, 2018

 Great!

NA
Aug 18, 2016

 External togethernes is mandatory in a world full of external injustices. Obviously Osho doesn't understand the connection in crowds, the divinity and collective conscious togtherness represents.

BO
Bob Jan 20, 2017

 I disagree. When you say "external injustices," you are labeling the whole as external.  When the external crowd is already full of individuals.  Anything outside of yourself is external, and anything that is external is not your true essence, but rather your helpless EGO looking for comfort, 

AR
Anand Rathore
Feb 10, 2013
 I read post and all comments. But before  I write something I just want to know all of you what you will call to such person , who dont understand value of spirituality , who pull you in mud of useless activities and who disturb you and bother you ? Please reply so I can write what I wanted to say.
KS
Kirsty Spraggon
Aug 22, 2010
Well this is thought provoking, being someone who loves people and crowds I found it a tad one sided. I think it is an interesting percpective but lacks balance. It makes no mention of the great value of relationships. Suffering fools can be a lesson in compassion and humanity, sometimes it's not about you but how you may be of service to another in need. I dont see how we could truely achieve spiritual growth and self awareness alone. It is the mirror that others provide that often help us grow as individuals. Otherwise wouldn't we all live alone on islands. Human beings intuitively want to connect, to share, touch, love and laugh. For me it's about finding the balance and being able to do both. To be completely comfortable alone and silent and to be just as comfortable in the space of others that is humanity at it's best. To love everyone, to learn from each other, support and love one another. As well as providing each other space to grow alone. To say that 'reflection only occurs i... View full comment
NA
Nahla Aug 18, 2016

 I agree!

PA
Jun 24, 2010
It is a pleasure to be joining the circle of sharing from electron land ;-) and yes, I love you all! :-) Why individuals decide to sit together? My reflections: this is the age of collective samadhi... last year, I wrote an email to all the community I know of called BeLOVED CommUNITY. Here is an excerpt that talks about spiritual companionship, and why is important to not only sit together but to eat together, to laugh together, to cry together: 3. The “Right” Companionship. With our own translations in mind [see point 2.], I’d like to conclude with an inspiring pragmatic/idea from the book Conquest of Mind by Sri Eknath Easwaran: [Spiritual friends are what Buddha would have called “right companionship.” Everything we do, he reminds us, either adds or subtracts from our own image as human beings. What we give our time and attention to, what we talk about, what we read about, the people we are close to – all these contribute... View full comment
RE
reader
Jun 18, 2010

the passage on judicious versus judgmental that nikki is referring to is this one:

http://www.ijourney.org/index.php?tid=683

JO
JOY
Jun 17, 2010

This has really opened my eyes,and it is not everyone that surround you that is really a good friend,it is wise to keep few.

NI
Jun 16, 2010

mmm... I wonder what it was in my words that made you think I advocate a spiritual leader who talks in the spirit of truth but walks in darkness and misleads others? I myself have never been a fan... Life led in the spirit of personal example is essential from just about anyone, especially someone who has a strong effect on so many people, like a spiritual leader.   

Perhaps we should return to a discussion we had recently about the difference between being judicious and judgmental. Of course it is necessary to make the distinction between ones who are on the path with you and ones who are not, but it's a whole'nother business to call them fools and disregard their company. That only encourages separation and the idea of superiority, which leads us back to a dualistic world and away from oneness. 

DA
Jun 16, 2010

Ripa, I really admire your writing and the depth you've taken to really dissect the essence of the article.

Your way of writing is so lucid and thoughtful. I agree with most of it

 

DA
Jun 16, 2010

I understand your rational reflection Nikki. But I DO NOT advocate any spiritual leader who talks in the spirit of 'truth" but walks in the spirit of darkness, whilst blinding people on his way. It's disrespect to your soul if you choose the path of delusion, but don't convert 1000s on your way to destruction.

It is imperative to judge, because without scrutiny of what's satya and asatya,  we'll nod our heads every time a charming articulate guru tries to advocate nirvana whilst asphyxiating us in maya.

Truth is ageless and a guru's goal is to dispel darkness. Like Osho himself said, the companionship of fool is not good. Buddha and Osho both scrutinised a fool's behaviour, so who are we to disagree with Bhagwan Rajeesh? 

 

NI
Nikki
Jun 15, 2010
Wow.. this is one of the most controversial passages I've experienced in this forum, and it certainly made me reflect on certain beliefs I've pondered about recently. i have to agree with some here that does indeed Osho display some amount of judgment here, which could make some feel uneasy. Then again, this is from a man who had a fleet of almost a 100 Rolls Royces, while living in one of the poorest countries in the world. Personally, I have a hard time finding someone with these kind of actions an authority on spirituality.   True, as folks who are trying to achieve inner peace, it is challenging to hang out with some who are further from the path and who'll try to take you there with them. But if you make a decision to stray, that is YOUR responsibility not theirs. Life is full of challenges and lessons, and sometimes they come in disguise, and it is our mission to decipher the lesson and continue on the path, while maintaining our awareness, equanimity and the smile on our ... View full comment
RA
Jun 14, 2010
I think this passage really required some deeper reflection on the meaning of solitude and renunciation and its role in spirituality to have true value. There is, on the one hand, something so beautiful the Swamiji, for example, from the Sivananda Ashram in Kerala, South India, who renounced his wife and career to move to India to pursue a path of deep solitude and spiritual growth. He couldn't speak a single word of the local dialect in India. At that time, nothing was written in English the way the language has become widespread these days. So this Swamiji befriended the birds, the monkeys and the trees of the jungle in Kerala. I think it is wonderful to have that opportunity to be that close and connected to Mother Nature. In our culture, both the western and Indian ones, as well as the European, and, I imagine, Middle Eastern and Latin American ones, we are inclined to feel great regard for those who walk a path of renunciation, by becoming Swamis or monks, priests or imams. Becau... View full comment
DA
Jun 13, 2010

This is coming from a man who sexually exploited devotees' young children and enjoyed a free sex and drugs philosophy.  And yes, you come here alone and you will die alone - as he did when he was substance-abused and gravely ill. You die with your karma here and carry on leaden burdened baggaeg if not solved.

"Remember the companions of fools is not good"

Just because he's well articulated, doesn't mean he's wise - Osho just recyled Hindu and Buddhist wisdom using it to manipulate his own self interests, like attempting to own his city.

The great Buddha said this 1000s of years ago way before this fool came along

KA
Karen
Jun 12, 2010

"There is no seperation between the observer and the observed. between the subject and the object ; they are a seamless continuem." J Krishnamurti.

SR
Jun 12, 2010
This passage was a little testy at first, and I found myself falling back on a belief I've decided to have. There is gold everywhere, but it comes to me covered with different amounts of mud, and it is my job to wash the mud away because I am after gold. And, the mud is not out there in the universe, it is in my mind. I felt, like others in the sharing, that the word "fools" was harsh and judgmental. But this little bit of mud washes away the moment I place myself in that category. I do not want to become the "fool" who harms other people's growth, but I know that I have done so in the past out of ignorance. I have therefore a responsibility to develop both heart and head. Head without heart is cold and intellectual and does great harm to myself and others. Heart without head leads to what some people call "idiot compassion" and also does great harm to myself and others. I have been guilty of both extremes at one time or the other, but I have seen that w... View full comment
VI
Jun 11, 2010

patsy, i've always appreciated what you share. wanted to think out loud about the questions you pose here, by posing one more question. as context for that question, this snippet from the passage:

"If ten internally focused individuals are sitting in a room, it is not that there are ten internally focused individuals sitting. It is each individual sitting by themselves, thereby not forming a crowd."

here's the question: this being the case (which I think it is), why do ten internally focused individuals still decide to sit together? i think there is real value in it, inspite of ultimately each individual sittiing by themselves.

reflections?

best,

PA
patsy
Jun 10, 2010

At the moment I read this I was feeling so sad about relationships. So sad to have feelings that others are not what you want them to be or do not give what you think you are needing.

So sad to think you are not strong enough to feel no need for the love of others or not strong enough to release all these feelings and float free like a feather.

If we travel the birth canal alone and the death river alone, does this mean we are to be alone between birth and death, death and birth - or the opposite? What does it mean when the memory of one person is stronger than the presence of another? Can I be alone if I have memories in my mind which bring feelings?

I will think about all these things.

PA
Jun 8, 2010

I wish you the best on your journey, and when in repose consider a moment of thankfulness to even the people who left you alone *because* of their external orientation...toward*your* well-being.

Myself? I often enjoy the companionship of fools for while it may not be good, it does beget wisdom. "For I am conscious that I am not wise either much or little. What then does it [the Delphic oracle] mean declaring that I am the wisest? - Socrates in Plato's Apology 21b

 

 

BA
baobab
Jun 8, 2010

the fallacy of the fallacy of togetherness.

NOTHING COULD BE MORE WRONG ! I don't even know where to begin as I have no time to post, but in brief:

1. those who are not on the path need friends much more than those who are already on it.

2. The illusion of this world is of separateness, you do not come into this world alone, nor do you leave it alone.

3. "Let your solitude retain its purity", there is no such thing as pure solitude, everything and every being is deeply interconnected, solitude is maya.

Read Rilke if you want some truth about being alone, being quiet and being together.

be well and be the change and think for yourself,

S

NA
Jun 8, 2010

You have never been alone and will never be alone. There is no "aloneness" in nature because all is and ever will be genuinely tied to everything else. This is true whether or not you are or choose to be aware of it. The real question is, and as Osho is attempting to explain, are you able and willing to turn your awareness inward to achieve at least some degree of inner quiet and peace AND, are you able and willing to allow others to do the same. You will never be "alone" nor is solitude genuinely achievable. You can, however, find some mental state of quiet and peace, some healthy balance, and achieve the same with relation to those near and distant from you.

If you are indeed able, you ought to also be willing for your own benefit and for the benefit of those whose quiet and peace you might possibly destroy.

VO
Vovo
Jun 8, 2010

Timely message shared today. Of late I have realised that I have entertained people who are so consumed about themselves they lack the ability to move beyond themselves. They take from you in the form of advice and leave you drained most times. I have noted within my moments of solitude how to identify these traits within so called friends and in learning to embrace my own moments of silence I find peace in remembering who I am without the influence of noise.

AL
Alisa
Jun 8, 2010

How timely this was for me. I have realized lately that I am allowing negative people in my life to weigh my spirit down which only keeps me from moving forward on my quest. "The companionship of fools is no good" really nailed it on the head for me. I will only surround myself with people that have gone deep into themselves.

Thanks for this reminder!

Have a peaceful day!

AF
A.F. Johnson
Jun 8, 2010

 TheMeaningOfLifeIn13Minutes.info

JL
Jenny Laity
Jun 8, 2010

 I have felt most alone when I have been with others. I have learnt to surrender, to fall and am most at peace when I am still within me and the energy within suffices and expands and enriches. To be with others who understand this stillness is wonderful and so humbling. I wish all could experience Osho's wisdom. Much love and peace. x

RC
Rebecca Calaor
Jun 8, 2010

I like this reflection. I tend to be alone than to have a disturbing company and I know deep within I have to bear them but if it stress me I go on on what is healthy for me to be of service to other people who are more in need than myself.

Thank you for enriching my insight on 'solitude'. God bless.

EM
emmanuel
Jun 8, 2010

revealing indeed.