You're giving various examples of what may stimulate radical amazement. But radical amazement itself isn't "so many things." There's a difference between definition and example.
BTW I believe that Heschel would have been concerned about the equating of "amazement" with "thrill." Amazement is long-lasting. Thrill is brief and temporary. Thrill-seeking is shallow and ultimately exhausting to body, mind, and spirit; searching for and contemplating amazement is a deep, healthful process that promotes greater wellbeing.
WHAT IS THE ACTUAL SOURCE OF THIS QUOTATION?? Naming the (alleged) author is not enough. Heschel wrote many books, articles, talks, etc. At least give the overall title of the work. Without the reader's ability to check the source, all we have is the posted claim that Heschel wrote this. (I know he actually did, but that's not the point.) Heschel was also a scholar. He would have been appalled at the lack of reference to the actual title of the work where this statement can be found. DO BETTER.